Systems and methods for analyzing performance of an entity

ABSTRACT

Systems and methods are provided for analyzing entity performance. In accordance with one implementation, a method is provided that includes receiving data associated with a geographic region and transforming the received data into an object model. The method also includes analyzing the object model to associate the received data with a plurality of entities and to associate the received data with a plurality of sub-geographic regions of the geographic region. The method also includes applying a prediction model to the plurality of sub-geographic regions using the object model to determine a predicted performance for at least one entity of the plurality of entities. Further, the method includes determining actual performance for the at least one entity and providing a user interface that includes information associated with the predicted performance, the actual performance, or a combination of the predicted performance and the actual performance.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. Non-Provisional application Ser. No. 14/045,720, filed on Oct. 3, 2013, the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

The amount of information being processed and stored is rapidly increasing as technology advances present an ever-increasing ability to generate and store data. This data is commonly stored in computer-based systems in structured data stores. For example, one common type of data store is a so-called “flat” file such as a spreadsheet, plain-text document, or XML document. Another common type of data store is a relational database comprising one or more tables. Other examples of data stores that comprise structured data include, without limitation, files systems, object collections, record collections, arrays, hierarchical trees, linked lists, stacks, and combinations thereof.

Numerous organizations, including industry, retail, and government entities, recognize that important information and decisions can be drawn if massive data sets can be analyzed to identify patterns of behavior. Collecting and classifying large sets of data in an appropriate manner allows these entities to more quickly and efficiently identify these patterns, thereby allowing them to make more informed decisions.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings which illustrate exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure and in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates, in block diagram form, an exemplary data fusion system for providing interactive data analysis, consistent with embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary system for analyzing performance of an entity, consistent with embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an exemplary computer system with which embodiments of the present disclosure can be implemented.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart representing an exemplary process for analyzing entity performance, consistent with the embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart representing an exemplary process for analyzing received data, consistent with the embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 6A is a screenshot of an exemplary depiction of a graphical user interface, consistent with embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 6B is a screenshot of an exemplary depiction of a graphical user interface, consistent with embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 7A is a screenshot of an exemplary depiction of a graphical user interface, consistent with embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 7B is a screenshot of an exemplary depiction of a graphical user interface, consistent with embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 7C is a screenshot of an exemplary depiction of a graphical user interface, consistent with embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 7D is a screenshot of an exemplary depiction of a graphical user interface, consistent with embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 8A is a screenshot of an exemplary depiction of a graphical user interface, consistent with embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 8B is a screenshot of an exemplary depiction of a graphical user interface, consistent with embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 9 is a screenshot of an exemplary depiction of a graphical user interface, consistent with embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 10 is a screenshot of an exemplary depiction of a graphical user interface, consistent with embodiments of the present disclosure.

DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

Reference will now be made in detail to the embodiments, the examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Whenever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.

FIG. 1 illustrates, in block diagram form, an exemplary data fusion system 100 for providing interactive data analysis, consistent with embodiments of the present disclosure. Among other things, data fusion system 100 facilitates transformation of one or more data sources, such as data sources 130 (e.g., financial services systems 220, geographic data systems 230, merchant management systems 240 and/or consumer data systems 250, as shown in FIG. 2) into an object model 160 whose semantics are defined by an ontology 150. The transformation can be performed for a variety of reasons. For example, a database administrator can import data from data sources 130 into a database 170 for persistently storing object model 160. As another example, a data presentation component (not depicted) can transform input data from data sources 130 “on the fly” into object model 160. The object model 160 can then be utilized, in conjunction with ontology 150, for analysis through graphs and/or other data visualization techniques.

Data fusion system 100 comprises a definition component 110 and a translation component 120, both implemented by one or more processors of one or more computing devices or systems executing hardware and/or software-based logic for providing various functionality and features of the present disclosure, as described herein. As will be appreciated from the present disclosure, data fusion system 100 can comprise fewer or additional components that provide the various functionalities and features described herein. Moreover, the number and arrangement of the components of data fusion system 100 responsible for providing the various functionalities and features described herein can further vary from embodiment to embodiment.

Definition component 110 generates and/or modifies ontology 150 and a schema map 140. Exemplary embodiments for defining an ontology (such as ontology 150) are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,962,495 (the '495 patent), issued on Jun. 14, 2011, the entire contents of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. Consistent with certain embodiments disclosed in the '495 patent, a dynamic ontology may be used to create a database. To create a database ontology, one or more object types may be defined, where each object type includes one or more properties. The attributes of object types or property types of the ontology can be edited or modified at any time. And, for each property type, at least one parser definition may be created. The attributes of a parser definition can be edited or modified at any time.

In some embodiments, each property type is declared to be representative of one or more object types. A property type is representative of an object type when the property type is intuitively associated with the object type. In some embodiments, each property type has one or more components and a base type. In some embodiments, a property type can comprise a string, a date, a number, or a composite type consisting of two or more string, date, or number elements. Thus, property types are extensible and can represent complex data structures. Further, a parser definition can reference a component of a complex property type as a unit or token.

An example of a property having multiple components is an Address property having a City component and a State component. An example of raw input data is “Los Angeles, Calif.” An example parser definition specifies an association of imported input data to object property components as follows: {CITY}, {STATE}→Address:State, Address:City. In some embodiments, the association {CITY}, {STATE} is defined in a parser definition using regular expression symbology. The association {CITY}, {STATE} indicates that a city string followed by a state string, and separated by a comma, comprises valid input data for a property of type Address. In contrast, input data of “Los Angeles Calif.” would not be valid for the specified parser definition, but a user could create a second parser definition that does match input data of “Los Angeles Calif.” The definition Address:City, Address:State specifies that matching input data values map to components named “City” and “State” of the Address property. As a result, parsing the input data using the parser definition results in assigning the value “Los Angeles” to the Address:City component of the Address property, and the value “CA” to the Address:State component of the Address property.

According to some embodiments, schema map 140 can define how various elements of schemas 135 for data sources 130 map to various elements of ontology 150. Definition component 110 receives, calculates, extracts, or otherwise identifies schemas 135 for data sources 130. Schemas 135 define the structure of data sources 130; for example, the names and other characteristics of tables, files, columns, fields, properties, and so forth. Definition component 110 furthermore optionally identifies sample data 136 from data sources 130. Definition component 110 can further identify object type, relationship, and property definitions from ontology 150, if any already exist. Definition component 110 can further identify pre-existing mappings from schema map 140, if such mappings exist.

Based on the identified information, definition component 110 can generate a graphical user interface 115. Graphical user interface 115 can be presented to users of a computing device via any suitable output mechanism (e.g., a display screen, an image projection, etc.), and can further accept input from users of the computing device via any suitable input mechanism (e.g., a keyboard, a mouse, a touch screen interface, etc.). Graphical user interface 115 features a visual workspace that visually depicts representations of the elements of ontology 150 for which mappings are defined in schema map 140.

In some embodiments, transformation component 120 can be invoked after schema map 140 and ontology 150 have been defined or redefined. Transformation component 120 identifies schema map 140 and ontology 150. Transformation component 120 further reads data sources 130 and identifies schemas 135 for data sources 130. For each element of ontology 150 described in schema map 140, transformation component 120 iterates through some or all of the data items of data sources 130, generating elements of object model 160 in the manner specified by schema map 140. In some embodiments, transformation component 120 can store a representation of each generated element of object model 160 in a database 170. In some embodiments, transformation component 120 is further configured to synchronize changes in object model 160 back to data sources 130.

Data sources 130 can be one or more sources of data, including, without limitation, spreadsheet files, databases, email folders, document collections, media collections, contact directories, and so forth. Data sources 130 can include data structures stored persistently in non-volatile memory. Data sources 130 can also or alternatively include temporary data structures generated from underlying data sources via data extraction components, such as a result set returned from a database server executing an database query.

Schema map 140, ontology 150, and schemas 135 can be stored in any suitable structures, such as XML files, database tables, and so forth. In some embodiments, ontology 150 is maintained persistently. Schema map 140 can or cannot be maintained persistently, depending on whether the transformation process is perpetual or a one-time event. Schemas 135 need not be maintained in persistent memory, but can be cached for optimization.

Object model 160 comprises collections of elements such as typed objects, properties, and relationships. The collections can be structured in any suitable manner. In some embodiments, a database 170 stores the elements of object model 160, or representations thereof. In some embodiments, the elements of object model 160 are stored within database 170 in a different underlying format, such as in a series of object, property, and relationship tables in a relational database.

According to some embodiments, the functionalities, techniques, and components described herein are implemented by one or more special-purpose computing devices. The special-purpose computing devices can be hard-wired to perform the techniques, or can include digital electronic devices such as one or more application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) or field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) that are persistently programmed to perform the techniques, or can include one or more general purpose hardware processors programmed to perform the techniques pursuant to program instructions in firmware, memory, other storage, or a combination. Such special-purpose computing devices can also combine custom hard-wired logic, ASICs, or FPGAs with custom programming to accomplish the techniques. The special-purpose computing devices can be desktop computer systems, portable computer systems, handheld devices, networking devices, or any other device that incorporates hard-wired and/or program logic to implement the techniques.

In embodiments described herein, data fusion system 100 can provide an entity, such as a retail merchant, to analyze information to identify behaviors to allow that entity to make more informed decisions. Such information can allow retail entities, such as a retail merchant, to determine where to place their retail locations. Entities having more than one location (e.g., a merchant with a chain store or a franchise model) typically evaluate the performance of their locations and may adjust their business models or work flows when the locations under-perform. Typically, entities evaluate the performance of their locations based on period-to-period metrics. For example, an entity can evaluate a location's performance by comparing the current month's sales to the previous month's sales. In addition, entitles can evaluate each of its locations' performance using comparative analysis. For example, an entity might compare the sales at a first location with the sales at a second location. As entities generally measure the performance of its locations based on its own transaction data (e.g., the entity's sales across some or all of its locations), current methods of measuring performance do not consider sales made by competitors or demographic features of the areas of the entity's locations.

Since current performance evaluation methods do not consider the sales of competitors or the demographic features of the region of the entity location, measured performance may not represent the true performance of an entity. For instance, although an entity location in a low consumer spend capacity area might have less sales than an entity location in a high consumer spend capacity area, it may be performing better than what could be expected for that area in light of, for example, the low number of consumers residing in the area or the low income of the area. Entity location performance can be adversely impacted by the close proximity of another location of the entity, but the entity location can be performing better than expected given the competition from the other entity location. Conversely, while an entity location in a dense, high-income area might have the highest sales of all entity locations, it can be under-performing because, for instance, consumer spend capacity is high and the entity location could generate more sales.

Consistent with embodiments of the present disclosure, the performance of entities can be analyzed based on how the entity is expected to perform given the location of the entity. For a given entity location, the disclosed embodiments may be implemented to consider, for example, consumer demographic features of the entity location's area and the proximity of competitors to the entity location (including the proximity of other close-by entity locations). Based on these and/or similar factors, a prediction of the amount of sales or number transactions for an entity location can be determined and compared to the actual amount of sales or transactions for the entity location to determine the performance of the entity location. In some embodiments, the entity can be a merchant. For purposes of illustration, exemplary embodiments for analyzing entity performance are described herein with reference to “merchants.” However, the exemplary embodiments and techniques described herein may be applied to other types of entities (e.g., service providers, governmental agencies, etc.) within the spirit and scope of this disclosure.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary system 200 for performing one or more operations for analyzing performance of an entity, consistent with disclosed embodiments. In some embodiments, the entity is a merchant and system 200 can include merchant analysis system 210, one or more financial services systems 220, one or more geographic data systems 230, one or more merchant management systems 240, and one or more consumer data systems 250. The components and arrangement of the components included in system 200 can vary depending on the embodiment. For example, the functionality described below with respect to financial services systems 220 can be embodied in consumer data systems 250, or vice-versa. Thus, system 200 can include fewer or additional components that perform or assist in the performance of one or more processes to analyze merchants, consistent with the disclosed embodiments.

One or more components of system 200 can be computing systems configured to analyze merchant performance. As further described herein, components of system 200 can include one or more computing devices (e.g., computer(s), server(s), etc.), memory storing data and/or software instructions (e.g., database(s), memory devices, etc.), and other known computing components. In some embodiments, the one or more computing devices are configured to execute software or a set of programmable instructions stored on one or more memory devices to perform one or more operations, consistent with the disclosed embodiments. Components of system 200 can be configured to communicate with one or more other components of system 200, including merchant analysis system 210, one or more financial services systems 220, one or more geographic data systems 230, one or more merchant management systems 240, and one or more consumer data systems 250. In certain aspects, users can operate one or more components of system 200. The one or more users can be employees of, or associated with, the entity corresponding to the respective component(s) (e.g., someone authorized to use the underlying computing systems or otherwise act on behalf of the entity).

Merchant analysis system 210 can be a computing system configured to analyze merchant performance. For example, merchant analysis system 210 can be a computer system configured to execute software or a set of programmable instructions that collect or receive financial transaction data, consumer data, and merchant data and process it to determine the predicted spend amounts for a merchant and determine the actual spend amounts for the merchant. Merchant analysis system 210 can be configured, in some embodiments, to utilize, include, or be a data fusion system 100 (see, e.g., FIG. 1) to transform data from various data sources (such as, financial services systems 220, geographic data systems 230, merchant management systems 240, and consumer data systems 250) for processing. In some embodiments, merchant analysis system 210 can be implemented using a computer system 300, as shown in FIG. 3 and described below.

Merchant analysis system 210 can include one or more computing devices (e.g., server(s)), memory storing data and/or software instructions (e.g., database(s), memory devices, etc.) and other known computing components. According to some embodiments, merchant analysis system 210 can include one or more networked computers that execute processing in parallel or use a distributed computing architecture. Merchant analysis system 210 can be configured to communicate with one or more components of system 200, and it can be configured to provide analysis of merchants via an interface(s) accessible by users over a network (e.g., the Internet). For example, merchant analysis system 210 can include a web server that hosts a web page accessible through network 260 by merchant management systems 240. In another embodiment, merchant analysis system 210 can include an application server configured to provide data to one or more client applications executing on computing systems connected to merchant analysis system 210 via network 260.

In some embodiments, merchant analysis system 210 can be configured to determine an expected spend amount for a merchant or merchant location by processing and analyzing data collected from one or more components of system 200. For example, merchant analysis system 210 can determine that Big Box Merchant store located at 123 Main St, in Burbank, Calif. should be generating $50,000 of sales per month. The merchant analysis system 210 can also be configured to determine the actual sales for a merchant or specific merchant location by processing and analyzing data collected from one or more components of system 200. For example, merchant analysis system 210 can determine that the Big Box Merchant store located at 123 Main St, in Burbank, Calif. is actually generating $60,000 of sales per month. Merchant analysis system 210 can provide an analysis of a merchant or merchant location's performance based on the predicted sales and the actual sales for the merchant or merchant location. For example, for the Big Box Merchant store located at 123 Main St., Burbank, Calif., the merchant analysis system 210 can provide an analysis that the store is performing above expectations. Exemplary processes that can be used by merchant analysis system 210 are described below with respect to FIGS. 4 and 5.

Merchant analysis system 210 can, in some embodiments, generate a user interface communicating data related to one or more merchants or merchant locations. For example, in some embodiments, merchant analysis system 210 includes a web server that generates HTML code, or scripts capable of generating HTML code, that can be displayed in a web browser executing on computing device. Merchant analysis system 210 can also execute an application server that provides user interface objects to a client application executing on a computing device, or it can provide data that is capable of being displayed in a user interface in a client application executing on a computing device. In some embodiments, merchant analysis system 210 can generate user interfaces that can be displayed within another user interface. For example, merchant analysis system 210 can generate a user interface for display within a parent user interface that is part of a word processing application, a presentation development application, a web browser, or an illustration application, among others. As used herein, the term “generating” in reference to a user interface can include generating the code that when executed displays information (e.g., HTML) or providing commands and/or data to a set of instructions that when executed render a user interface capable of being shown on a display connected to a computing device. In some embodiments, the user interface can include a map, indications of the merchant locations on a map, and indications of the sales or transactions associated with the merchant locations. Examples of some (although not all) user interfaces that can be generated by merchant analysis system 210 are described below with respect to FIGS. 6-10.

Referring again to FIG. 2, financial services system 220 can be a computing system associated with a financial service provider, such as a bank, credit card issuer, credit bureau, credit agency, or other entity that generates, provides, manages, and/or maintains financial service accounts for one or more users. Financial services system 220 can generate, maintain, store, provide, and/or process financial data associated with one or more financial service accounts. Financial data can include, for example, financial service account data, such as financial service account identification data, account balance, available credit, existing fees, reward points, user profile information, and financial service account transaction data, such as transaction dates, transaction amounts, transaction types, and location of transaction. Financial services system 220 can include infrastructure and components that are configured to generate and/or provide financial service accounts such as credit card accounts, checking accounts, savings account, debit card accounts, loyalty or reward programs, lines of credit, and the like.

Geographic data systems 230 can include one or more computing devices configured to provide geographic data to other computing systems in system 200 such as merchant analysis system 210. For example, geographic data systems 230 can provide geodetic coordinates when provided with a street address of vice-versa. In some embodiments, geographic data systems 230 exposes an application programming interface (API) including one or more methods or functions that can be called remotely over a network, such as network 260. According to some embodiments, geographic data systems 230 can provide information concerning routes between two geographic points. For example, merchant analysis system 210 can provide two addresses and geographic data systems 230 can provide, in response, the aerial distance between the two addresses, the distance between the two addresses using roads, and/or a suggested route between the two addresses and the route's distance.

According to some embodiments, geographic data systems 230 can also provide map data to merchant analysis system 210 and/or other components of system 200. The map data can include, for example, satellite or overhead images of a geographic region or a graphic representing a geographic region. The map data can also include points of interest, such as landmarks, malls, shopping centers, schools, or popular restaurants or retailers, for example.

Merchant management systems 240 can be one or more computing devices configured to perform one or more operations consistent with disclosed embodiments. For example, merchant management systems 240 can be a desktop computer, a laptop, a server, a mobile device (e.g., tablet, smart phone, etc.), or any other type of computing device configured to request merchant analysis from merchant analysis system 210. According to some embodiments, merchant management systems 240 can comprise a network-enabled computing device operably connected to one or more other presentation devices, which can themselves constitute a computing system. For example, merchant management systems 240 can be connected to a mobile device, telephone, laptop, tablet, or other computing device.

Merchant management systems 240 can include one or more processors configured to execute software instructions stored in memory. Merchant management systems 240 can include software or a set of programmable instructions that when executed by a processor performs known Internet-related communication and content presentation processes. For example, merchant management systems 240 can execute software or a set of instructions that generates and displays interfaces and/or content on a presentation device included in, or connected to, merchant management systems 240. In some embodiments, merchant management systems 240 can be a mobile device that executes mobile device applications and/or mobile device communication software that allows merchant management systems 240 to communicate with components of system 200 over network 260. The disclosed embodiments are not limited to any particular configuration of merchant management systems 240.

Merchant management systems 240 can be one or more computing systems associated with a merchant that provides products (e.g., goods and/or services), such as a restaurant (e.g., Outback Steakhouse®, Burger King®, etc.), retailer (e.g., Amazon.com®, Target®, etc.), grocery store, mall, shopping center, service provider (e.g., utility company, insurance company, financial service provider, automobile repair services, movie theater, etc.), non-profit organization (ACLU™, AARP®, etc.) or any other type of entity that provides goods, services, and/or information that consumers (i.e., end-users or other business entities) can purchase, consume, use, etc. For ease of discussion, the exemplary embodiments presented herein relate to purchase transactions involving goods from retail merchant systems. Merchant management systems 240, however, is not limited to systems associated with retail merchants that conduct business in any particular industry or field.

Merchant management systems 240 can be associated with computer systems installed and used at a merchant brick and mortar locations where a consumer can physically visit and purchase goods and services. Such locations can include computing devices that perform financial service transactions with consumers (e.g., Point of Sale (POS) terminal(s), kiosks, etc.). Merchant management systems 240 can also include back- and/or front-end computing components that store data and execute software or a set of instructions to perform operations consistent with disclosed embodiments, such as computers that are operated by employees of the merchant (e.g., back office systems, etc.). Merchant management systems 240 can also be associated with a merchant that provides goods and/or service via known online or e-commerce types of solutions. For example, such a merchant can sell products via a website using known online or e-commerce systems and solutions to market, sell, and process online transactions. Merchant management systems 240 can include one or more servers that are configured to execute stored software or a set of instructions to perform operations associated with a merchant, including one or more processes associated with processing purchase transactions, generating transaction data, generating product data (e.g., SKU data) relating to purchase transactions, for example.

Consumer data systems 250 can include one or more computing devices configured to provide demographic data regarding consumers. For example, consumer data systems 250 can provide information regarding the name, address, gender, income level, age, email address, or other information about consumers. Consumer data systems 250 can include public computing systems such as computing systems affiliated with the U.S. Bureau of the Census, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, or FedStats, or it can include private computing systems such as computing systems affiliated with financial institutions, credit bureaus, social media sites, marketing services, or some other organization that collects and provides demographic data.

Network 260 can be any type of network or combination of networks configured to provide electronic communications between components of system 200. For example, network 260 can be any type of network (including infrastructure) that provides communications, exchanges information, and/or facilitates the exchange of information, such as the Internet, a Local Area Network, or other suitable connection(s) that enables the sending and receiving of information between the components of system 200. Network 260 may also comprise any combination of wired and wireless networks. In other embodiments, one or more components of system 200 can communicate directly through a dedicated communication link(s), such as links between merchant analysis system 210, financial services system 220, geographic data systems 230, merchant management systems 240, and consumer data systems 250.

As noted above, merchant analysis system 210 can include a data fusion system (e.g., data fusion system 100) for organizing data received from one or more of the components of system 200.

By way of example, FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an exemplary computer system 300, consistent with embodiments of the present disclosure. The components of system 200 such as merchant analysis system 210, financial service systems 220, geographic data systems 230, merchant management systems 240, and consumer data systems 250 may include the architecture based on or similar to that of computer system 300.

As illustrated in FIG. 3, computer system 300 includes a bus 302 or other communication mechanism for communicating information, and a hardware processor 304 coupled with bus 302 for processing information. Hardware processor 304 can be, for example, a general purpose microprocessor.

Computer system 300 also includes a main memory 306, such as a random access memory (RAM) or other dynamic storage device, coupled to bus 302 for storing information and instructions to be executed by processor 304. Main memory 306 also can be used for storing temporary variables or other intermediate information during execution of instructions to be executed by processor 304. Such instructions, when stored in non-transitory storage media accessible to processor 304, render computer system 300 into a special-purpose machine that is customized to perform the operations specified in the instructions.

Computer system 300 further includes a read only memory (ROM) 308 or other static storage device coupled to bus 302 for storing static information and instructions for processor 304. A storage device 310, such as a magnetic disk or optical disk, is provided and coupled to bus 302 for storing information and instructions.

Computer system 300 can be coupled via bus 302 to a display 312, such as a cathode ray tube (CRT), liquid crystal display, or touch screen, for displaying information to a computer user. An input device 314, including alphanumeric and other keys, is coupled to bus 302 for communicating information and command selections to processor 304. Another type of user input device is cursor control 316, such as a mouse, a trackball, or cursor direction keys for communicating direction information and command selections to processor 304 and for controlling cursor movement on display 312. The input device typically has two degrees of freedom in two axes, a first axis (for example, x) and a second axis (for example, y), that allows the device to specify positions in a plane.

Computer system 300 can implement the techniques described herein using customized hard-wired logic, one or more ASICs or FPGAs, firmware and/or program logic which in combination with the computer system causes or programs computer system 300 to be a special-purpose machine. According to some embodiments, the operations, functionalities, and techniques disclosed herein are performed by computer system 300 in response to processor 304 executing one or more sequences of one or more instructions contained in main memory 306. Such instructions can be read into main memory 306 from another storage medium, such as storage device 310. Execution of the sequences of instructions contained in main memory 306 causes processor 304 to perform the process steps described herein. In alternative embodiments, hard-wired circuitry can be used in place of or in combination with software instructions.

The term “storage media” as used herein refers to any non-transitory media that stores data and/or instructions that cause a machine to operate in a specific fashion. Such storage media can comprise non-volatile media and/or volatile media. Non-volatile media includes, for example, optical or magnetic disks, such as storage device 310. Volatile media includes dynamic memory, such as main memory 306. Common forms of storage media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, hard disk, solid state drive, magnetic tape, or any other magnetic data storage medium, a CD-ROM, any other optical data storage medium, any physical medium with patterns of holes, a RAM, a PROM, and EPROM, a FLASH-EPROM, NVRAM, any other memory chip or cartridge.

Storage media is distinct from, but can be used in conjunction with, transmission media. Transmission media participates in transferring information between storage media. For example, transmission media includes coaxial cables, copper wire and fiber optics, including the wires that comprise bus 302. Transmission media can also take the form of acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during radio-wave and infra-red data communications.

Various forms of media can be involved in carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions to processor 304 for execution. For example, the instructions can initially be carried on a magnetic disk or solid state drive of a remote computer. The remote computer can load the instructions into its dynamic memory and send the instructions over a telephone line using a modem. A modem local to computer system 300 can receive the data on the telephone line and use an infra-red transmitter to convert the data to an infra-red signal. An infra-red detector can receive the data carried in the infra-red signal and appropriate circuitry can place the data on bus 302. Bus 302 carries the data to main memory 306, from which processor 304 retrieves and executes the instructions. The instructions received by main memory 306 can optionally be stored on storage device 310 either before or after execution by processor 304.

Computer system 300 also includes a communication interface 318 coupled to bus 302. Communication interface 318 provides a two-way data communication coupling to a network link 320 that is connected to a local network 322. For example, communication interface 318 can be an integrated services digital network (ISDN) card, cable modem, satellite modem, or a modem to provide a data communication connection to a corresponding type of telephone line. As another example, communication interface 318 can be a local area network (LAN) card to provide a data communication connection to a compatible LAN. Wireless links can also be implemented. In any such implementation, communication interface 318 sends and receives electrical, electromagnetic or optical signals that carry digital data streams representing various types of information.

Network link 320 typically provides data communication through one or more networks to other data devices. For example, network link 320 can provide a connection through local network 322 to a host computer 324 or to data equipment operated by an Internet Service Provider (ISP) 326. ISP 326 in turn provides data communication services through the world wide packet data communication network now commonly referred to as the “Internet” 328. Local network 322 and Internet 328 both use electrical, electromagnetic or optical signals that carry digital data streams. The signals through the various networks and the signals on network link 320 and through communication interface 318, which carry the digital data to and from computer system 300, are example forms of transmission media.

Computer system 300 can send messages and receive data, including program code, through the network(s), network link 320 and communication interface 318. In the Internet example, a server 330 can transmit a requested code for an application program through Internet 328, ISP 326, local network 322 and communication interface 318. The received code can be executed by processor 304 as it is received, and/or stored in storage device 310, or other non-volatile storage for later execution.

As described above with respect to FIG. 2, merchant analysis system 210 can perform one or more processes for analyzing the performance of merchants based on predicted sales and actual sales. FIGS. 4 and 5 are flowcharts illustrating exemplary processes for analyzing data and merchant performance, consistent with embodiments of the present disclosure. While FIGS. 4 and 5 illustrate embodiments processes using particular methodologies or techniques, other methodologies or techniques known in the art can be substituted without detracting from the spirit and scope of these embodiments. Also, while the description that follows describes the processes of FIGS. 4 and 5 as performed by merchant analysis system 210, in some embodiments, another component of system 200, or some sub-system of the components of system 200 (not shown) can perform part or all of these processes.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart representing an exemplary process for analyzing merchant performance. While the flowchart discloses the following steps in a particular order, it will be appreciated that at least some of the steps can be moved, modified, or deleted where appropriate, consistent with the teachings of the present disclosure.

In some embodiments, a merchant analysis system (e.g., merchant analysis system 210) receives financial transaction data, consumer data, and merchant data from one or more financial services systems (e.g., financial services systems 220), merchant management systems (e.g., merchant management systems 240), and/or consumer data systems (e.g., consumer data systems 250) (step 410). The merchant analysis system can receive the data after it requests it via an API or it can receive the data automatically via a network (e.g., network 260). It will be appreciated that additional methods for data transfer between a merchant analysis system and data systems may be implemented, without changing the scope and sprit of the disclosed embodiments.

In some embodiments, the financial services systems, the merchant management systems, and the consumer data systems can provide the data to the merchant analysis system in a batch format on a periodic basis, such as daily, weekly, or monthly. The financial transaction data, consumer data, and merchant data can be sent as a data stream, text file, serialized object, or any other conventional method for transmitting data between computing systems.

In some embodiments, the financial transaction data can reflect purchase transactions at one or more merchants offering goods and/or services, and it can include information regarding one or more consumer transactions. A consumer transaction can include, among other things, the date and time for the transaction, the purchase amount for the transaction, a unique consumer identifier associated with the transaction, a description of the merchant for the transaction, a category code associated with the merchant (e.g., retail goods, medical services, dining), and geographic indicator (e.g., postal code, street address, GPS coordinates, etc.). As financial transaction data can originate from several financial services systems, each providing different information for each consumer transaction, the information contained in the spending transaction data originating from a first financial data system can be different from the information contained in spending transaction data originating from a second financial data system. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the merchant analysis system can translate the data received from the financial services system. For example, the merchant analysis system can import the received data into an object model according to an ontology using a transformation component (e.g., transformation component 120).

Consumer transactions reflected in the received financial transaction data can include several types of consumer transactions. For example, the consumer transactions can correspond to credit card purchases or refunds, debit card purchases or refunds, eChecks, electronic wallet transactions, wire transfers, etc. The consumer transactions can also include transactions associated with reward or loyalty programs. For example, the consumer transactions can include the number of loyalty points, and their cash equivalent, used to earn discounts or receive free dining. Financial transaction data received from one financial data system can include more than one type of consumer transaction type. For example, spending transaction data received from a bank can include debit card, credit card, and eCheck consumer transactions.

In some embodiments, the consumer data can include demographic information regarding one or more consumers. For example, the consumer data can include information about consumers' income, gender, age, employment status, home ownership status, or ethnicity, among others. In some embodiments, the consumer data can be associated with a geographic region. For example, the consumer data can be associated with a zip code, neighborhood, or street address. In some embodiments, the merchant analysis system can receive the consumer data with respect to particular individuals. For example, the consumer data can be a data set where each record of the dataset corresponds to an individual consumer.

The merchant analysis system can also receive merchant data. In some embodiments, the merchant analysis system receives merchant data from the merchant management system. The merchant data can include information about a merchant. For example, the merchant data can include the address of a merchant's retail locations and attributes of the merchant's retail locations such as square footage, product lines, typical price points, number of parking spaces, whether the retail location is in a mall or shopping center, or other features that can make the merchant location attractive or unattractive to consumers. According to some embodiments, the merchant data can include information about the merchant's competitors. For example, the merchant data can include the names of the competitors, the locations of the competitors retail locations and attributes of the merchant's competitor's retail locations such as square footage, product lines, typical price points, number of parking spaces, whether the retail location is in a mall or shopping center, or other features that can make the competitor location attractive or unattractive to consumers.

After the merchant analysis system receives the financial transaction data, the consumer data, and the merchant data, the merchant analysis system 210 can analyze it (step 420). In some embodiments, the merchant analysis system 210 can organize the received data using an object model (e.g., object model 160 described above with respect to FIGS. 2A and 2B) for allowing users to better analyze the data.

The analyzing of the received data in step 420 can be implemented according to FIG. 5, which is a flowchart representing an exemplary process 500 for analyzing received data, consistent with embodiments of the present disclosure. While the flowchart of FIG. 5 discloses the following steps in a particular order, it will be appreciated that at least some of the steps can be moved, modified, or deleted where appropriate, consistent with the teachings of the present disclosure. For example, in some embodiments, while performing analyze received data process 500, the merchant analysis system can determine consumers for financial data (step 520) before determining merchants for the financial data (step 510), or it can map the financial transaction data to geohash regions (step 530) before determining merchants or consumers associated with the financial data (steps 510, 520).

In some embodiments, while performing analyze received data process 500, the merchant analysis system can reorganize the received data using an object model (e.g., object model 160) to better utilize that data. For example, the merchant analysis system can use a schema map, a transformation component and an ontology (e.g., schema map 140, transformation component 120, and ontology 150) to translate date received from the financial services systems or the merchant management systems into an object model (e.g., object model 160) for later analysis. In some embodiments, a different data translation method may be implemented to analyze the received data (e.g., a data translation method that does not use an object model, schema map, transformation component or ontology).

One non-limiting example of an object that could be included in the object model is a merchant object. The merchant object can include one or more properties describing a merchant and an instance of that object can have values assigned to the properties corresponding with the data received from one or more data sources. For example, the merchant object can have properties such as name, location, street address, zip code, merchant ID, merchandise category, transaction price range, among others, and the values of the properties can be set to “John's Gas,” “Irvine, Calif.,” “123 Main St.” “92614,” “123456,” “fuel; food,” and “$0-$100,” respectively. Another non-limiting example of an object that could be included in the object model is a location object. A location object, in some embodiments, can include properties related to the demographic features of the location. For example, the location object can have properties such as city, state, zip code, average age of resident, average income of resident, among others, and the values of the properties can be set to “Irvine,” “CA,” “92614,” “36,” and “75,000” respectively. Another non-limiting example of an object that can be included in the object model is a purchase object. A purchase object, in some embodiments, can include properties related to purchases such as the amount of the purchase, the time of purchase, the nature of the good purchases, or the information regarding the purchaser. The purchase object can be used, for example, to determine features such as the seasonality of purchases (e.g., the time period when purchases are typically made, on average) or customer clusters that are making the purchases (e.g., “businessperson,” “home owner”). One example of a customer cluster can include a “business person” cluster.

In some embodiments, the merchant analysis system can analyze received data process 500 by determining merchants for the received financial data (step 510). The financial transaction data typically will not come with an identifier for the merchant where the financial transaction data occurred. For example, a typical consumer transaction can include the amount of the transaction, a merchant category code (e.g., retail, restaurant, automotive), a description of the merchant (e.g., “John's Gas, Irvine, Calif.”), time and date of the transaction, and other information associated with the transaction but not specifically identifying the merchant where the transaction occurred (e.g., using a unique merchant identification number). As a result, the merchant analysis system can perform a matching process to match the consumer transactions of the financial transaction data with one or more merchant of which the merchant analysis system has knowledge.

In some embodiments, the merchant analysis system can have access to data associated with, and describing, a plurality of known merchants. The data can be received by the merchant analysis system (e.g., at step 410) from merchant management systems, the financial services systems, or it can be part of the schemas used to create the object model before merchant analysis system performs analyze received data process 500. The data describing the known merchants can include the name and address of the payee, the payee category code of the payee (e.g., retail, restaurant, etc.), typical spending ranges, or other data. As most of the consumer transactions of the financial transaction data include at least a category code and a postal code, after the merchant analysis system performs the merchant identification process, it can filter the possible known merchants to match to the financial transaction data based on category code and postal code. For example, after the merchant analysis system receives financial transaction data indicating that a consumer transaction took place at a retail merchant in postal code 92603, it can access the data of known merchants and attempt to match only those merchants that are retail merchants in postal code 92603 with the consumer transaction. If only one merchant is known with the category code and the postal code, then the merchant analysis system can match the consumer transaction with that merchant. If more than one merchant is known for that category code and postal code, the merchant analysis system can compare the remainder of the parameters of the consumer transaction (e.g., description, transaction amount) to the parameters of known merchants. For example, if two retail merchants in postal code 92603 are known, the merchant analysis system can compare the description of the consumer transaction to the descriptions of each merchant. In some embodiments, transaction amount can also be used to determine the merchant associated with a consumer transaction of the financial transaction data. For example, if one merchant in 92603 typically has transactions that average in orders of magnitude of $10, and a second merchant in 92603 has transactions that average in orders of magnitude of $100, the merchant analysis system can match a transaction of $23 to the first merchant, and not the second.

In some embodiments, the merchant analysis system can also match consumer transactions of the financial transaction data with one or more consumers (step 520). In some embodiments, the merchant analysis system can associate a consumer transaction with an individual consumer. For example, the merchant analysis system can match a consumer transaction to a consumer based on the name, address, phone number, or account number associated with the consumer transaction. In some embodiments, the financial transaction data can include a consumer identifier that has been generated by the system providing the financial transaction data for the purposes of consumer identification by merchant analysis system. For example, the financial services systems can include, with each consumer transaction, a unique, anonymous consumer identifier that allows the merchant analysis system to match consumer transactions coming from the same consumer without providing the merchant analysis system with actual data to specifically identify the consumer. For example, a consumer transaction made by John Smith, 123 Main St, Newport Beach, Calif. 92660, Account Number 4123 4444 5555 6666, phone number 949-555-1122 can be provided to merchant analysis system with a consumer identification number of 98765. When John Smith makes additional purchases, each of his consumer transactions will be received by the merchant analysis system with consumer identification number 98765. In some embodiments, the merchant analysis system can assign a unique consumer identification number when it imports the financial transaction data into the object model.

In some embodiments, the merchant analysis system can map the financial data transaction to geohash regions (step 530). A geohash region, or geohash bucket, is a region associated with a latitude/longitude, hierarchal geocode system that subdivides regions of the Earth into grid shaped buckets. The level of granularity of geohash regions can vary depending on the length of the geohash code corresponding to that region. For example, a geohash code that is one bit in length corresponds to a geohash region of roughly 20 million square kilometers, and a geohash code that is six bits in length corresponds to a geohash region of roughly 1.2 square kilometers. In some embodiments, a geohash region of five bits (roughly 18 square kilometers) is preferred, although the size of the geohash region can depend on the character of the overall region which is being geohashed. For example, a six bit geohash can be more suitable for a densely populated urban area, while a four bit geohash can be more suitable for a sparsely populated rural area.

In some embodiments, the merchant analysis system can map the financial transaction data to a geohash region by utilizing a standard geohash translation library. For example, the merchant analysis system can pass as input the address of the consumer associated with a consumer transaction of the financial transaction data and specify the number of geohash bits to return for the address, and the library can return the geohash for the passed in address. As the returned geohash code represents a level of precision for a given address, two addresses that are in the same geohash region will return the same geohash code. In some embodiments, the geohash translation library, or API, can be offered or exposed by the geographic data systems (e.g., geographic data systems 230).

After the merchant analysis system maps the financial transaction data to one or more geohash regions, the merchant analysis system can associate features to the geohash region (step 540). According to some embodiments, a feature is some characteristic of the financial transaction data or consumer data that describes some aspect of the geohash region. For example, a feature could be a demographic feature such as the income, gender, age, employment status, home ownership status, or ethnicity of the consumers residing within the geohash region. In some embodiments, a feature can also be a transactional feature of financial data. For example, a transactional feature can include total number of transactions originating from consumers residing in the geohash region, transactions (or “tickets”) above a particular value originating from the geohash region, or other features relating to the financial transaction data. According to some embodiments, the merchant analysis system associates features through the use of the object model and the relationship between the financial transaction data and the consumer data as defined in the schema map or the ontology.

Returning to FIG. 4, after the merchant analysis system has analyzed the received data, it can apply a prediction model to the data (step 430). A prediction model, in some embodiments, is a model that attempts to predict the performance for a particular merchant location. The performance can be measured in total sales, total transactions, or sales or transactions for a particular demographic feature (e.g., $1200 for males making over $100,000 a year). In addition, the prediction model can be used to predict performance based on the category of shopper. For example, the merchant analysis system can determine the spending habits of a particular consumer based on the financial transaction data and the consumer data analyzed by the merchant analysis system. For example, the merchant analysis system can determine that a particular consumer is a frequent purchaser of clothing, shoes, or electronics, or it can determine that the a consumer frequents restaurants or certain types of restaurants. Further, the merchant analysis system can determine the number of consumers of a particular category that reside within a particular geohash region. In some embodiments, the merchant analysis system can use the category of shopper information to predict the performance of a merchant location. For example, the merchant analysis system can predict that a merchant location should receive $10,000 a month from clothing shoppers.

According to some embodiments, the merchant analysis system predicts the performance of a merchant location by aggregating the predicted performance for the merchant location for each geohash region that is within the merchant location's territory. For example, the merchant analysis system can use the following equation to determine the predicted performance for a merchant location: P=Σ _(rϵG) n _(r) p _(r) x _(r)  (1) where P is the performance of the merchant location, G is the set of all geohash regions in the merchant location's territory (the territory from which the merchant location expects sales), r is an index representing each of the geohash regions, n_(r) is the number of consumers residing in geohash region r, p_(r) is the probability that a shopper from geohash region r will shop at the merchant location, and x_(r) is the expected spend amount associated with geohash region r across all competitors of the merchant location.

In some embodiments, the size of G can be variable and set by the merchant management system (or other computer system) requesting analysis of a merchant location it is managing. For example, a merchant location in an urban area might have a small G while a merchant location in a rural location can have a large G. In some embodiments, the merchant analysis system can limit the size of G to ensure efficient processing of predicted performance because as G increases, the number of calculations the merchant analysis system must complete to find P increases. For example, merchant analysis system can limit G to a five hundred square kilometer region so that calculations can be performed efficiently. In some embodiments, the size of G can be set through the use of a user interface, such as the exemplary user interface of FIGS. 6-10.

The number of consumers for a geohash region can be determined based on the consumer data the merchant analysis system receives. For example, the merchant analysis system can determine that all residents of a geohash region above a certain age are included in n_(r). In some embodiments, the number of consumers for a geohash region that the merchant analysis system uses to determine predicted performance may be set through the use of a user interface, such as the exemplary user interface of FIGS. 6-10. For example, a filter can be applied so that only consumers of a certain gender or income level are included in n_(r).

In some embodiments, p_(r), the probability that a shopper from geohash region r will shop at the merchant location, is determined using a Huff model. The Huff model attempts to determine the probability that a consumer located at particular distance from a retail location will shop at the retail location. In some embodiments, the Huff model uses the following equation:

$\begin{matrix} {P_{ij} = \frac{A_{j}^{\alpha}D_{ij}^{- \beta}}{{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{n}{A_{j}^{\alpha}D_{ij}^{- \beta}}} + C}} & (2) \end{matrix}$ where i is a consumer, j is a retail location, A_(j) is a measure of the attractiveness of store j, D_(ij) is the distance from consumer i to store j, α is an attractiveness parameter estimated from empirical observations, β is a distance decay parameter estimated from empirical observations, n is the total number of stores, including store j, in store j's retail area, and C is a constant representing sales leakage to non-retail location sales channels such as catalog sales and/or Internet sales, which has been estimated from empirical observations.

The numerator of equation (2) calculates the attractiveness to distance ratio for store j, while the denominator calculates the sum of the ratios of attractiveness to distance for store j and all of its competitors. In some embodiments, competitors include the same merchant as j, but in another location. The merchant analysis system can use a list of competitors provided to it by the merchant management systems as part of the merchant data it received (at step 410).

According to some embodiments, the attractiveness of a particular merchant location (A_(j)) is based on features of a particular merchant location. For example, the square footage, number of parking spaces, whether it is in a mall or shopping center, or pricing can be features that contribute to attractiveness of a particular merchant location. The value of the measure of attractiveness can be some index that combines one or more of these features into a single value. In some embodiments, an attractiveness parameter can be applied to the measure of attractiveness to weigh it according to how important the features contributing to the measure of attractiveness are in determining the probability that a particular consumer can make a purchase at the retail location. The attractiveness parameter can be adjusted overtime based on empirical observation.

In some embodiments, to calculate the distance from a geohash region to a retail location, the merchant analysis system calculates the distance from the centroid of the geohash region to the retail location. The merchant analysis system can calculate the distance using aerial distance, or it can calculate the distance using the driving or walking distance (e.g., using established roadways, walkways, or bicycle paths, where appropriate). In some embodiments, the merchant analysis system requests the geographic data systems to calculate the distance from the centroid of the geohash region to the retail location. The merchant analysis system can also use a distance decay parameter to weigh the impact of distance on the probability that a consumer from a geohash region would purchase an item from the retail location. For example, in rural locations, the large distances between consumers and retail locations is not as important as would be for urban locations. Thus, in some embodiments, the merchant analysis system can use a larger decay parameter in urban areas and a smaller one in rural areas.

Returning to equation (1) above, the merchant analysis system also determines the expected spend amount associated with geohash region or x_(r). The expected spend amount is a learned value, or weight, that is determined using online machine learning applied to the financial transaction data that has been received over time for a particular store. In some embodiments, financial transaction data, including the demographic or transactional features used to determine the performance of the store, are selected from geohash regions around a merchant location to form a test data set. The merchant analysis system then feeds the test data set into an online machine learning algorithm, which uses the data in a series of trials. The first trial occurs at a first point in time using a seed value, and the spend amount is predicted for a second point in time. The actual spend for the second point in time is them compared to the predicted spend for the second point in time. The difference is then used by the online machine learning algorithm to construct a second trial. This feedback loop continues until the difference between the predicted and actual spend over the test data set is minimized, and the learned weight can then be used to determine performance according to equation (1) above. While the merchant analysis system can use any known online machine learning method for determining the learned weight, in some embodiments, the merchant analysis system uses the Vowpal Wabbit library for determining the learned weights.

After applying the prediction model to the received data, the merchant analysis system can determine the actual amount spent at the merchant location for which it is calculating performance (step 440). In some embodiments, merchant analysis system uses the financial transaction data it received to determine the actual spend amount. For example, merchant analysis system 210 can add up all of the consumer transactions associated with the merchant location that match the features for which the merchant location's performance is being measured.

After it determines the actual spend amount for a merchant location, the merchant analysis system can determine performance of the merchant location (step 450) by comparing the predicted performance (at step 430) to the actual spend amount (at step 440), and express that performance through the use of a generated user interface (step 460). The performance can be expressed as a percentage (e.g., −5%), in dollars (e.g., −$400,000), in transactions (e.g., −5000 transactions), and/or some other metric. In some embodiments, the merchant analysis system can express the performance of the retail location with a text string, such as “under-performing,” “over-performing,” or “performing as expected.” In some embodiments, the user interface can include an icon or color to represent the performance of the merchant location. For example, an under-performing merchant location can be colored red.

In some embodiments, the merchant analysis system can generate one or more user interfaces communicating the financial transaction data, consumer data, and/or merchant data it received, as well as predicted and actual performance of merchant locations. According to some embodiments, the generated user interface contains a map showing one or more merchant locations, and/or one or more locations of the merchant's competitors. The merchant analysis system can generate a user interface by creating code that renders a user interface on another computing device, such as merchant management systems 240. For example, the merchant analysis system can generate HTML code that when interpreted by a web browser, renders the user interface. The merchant analysis system can also generate a user interface as a serialized object that is transmitted to a client application executing on other computing systems (e.g., merchant management systems 240), which then uses the serialized object to display the user interface on its screen.

FIGS. 6-10 illustrate several exemplary user interfaces that can be generated by merchant analysis system, consistent with embodiments of the present disclosure. The exemplary user interfaces of FIGS. 6-10 are meant to help illustrate and describe certain features of disclosed embodiments, and are not meant to limit the scope of the user interfaces that can be generated or provided by the merchant analysis system.

FIGS. 6A and 6B show user interface 600 that merchant analysis system (e.g., merchant analysis system 210) generates, according to some embodiments. User interface 600 includes map 610, which shows the location of merchant locations 620 and geohash regions (while shown as shaded rectangles, they can also include any unshaded rectangles, such as the unshaded rectangles in FIG. 7B). The user interface 600 also includes show user interface filter 630 and limit user interface filter 635. Show user interface filter 630 can be used to command the merchant analysis system to show a particular location (e.g., Burbank) and show data for a particular date range (e.g., Jan. 1, 2012 to May 16, 2013). In some embodiments, when a user enters information into the show user interface filter 630, the merchant analysis system receives a message to regenerate or modify the user interface. For example, if a user entered “Oceanside, Calif.” into the location box, the merchant analysis system would receive a message indicating that a user interface should display a map for Oceanside, Calif., and it can generate a user interface with map 610 showing Oceanside, Calif. In some embodiments, when a user enters information into limit user interface 635, the merchant analysis system receives a message to modify information displayed on user interface 600.

User interface 600 includes performance display selector 640 and merchant selector 645. The performance display selector 640 can be used to command merchant analysis system to change the performance data being displayed for merchant locations mapped on map 610. For example, when “Total Spend” is selected, merchant analysis system 210 generates user interface 600 such that performance data is shown in the amount, in dollars, spent, and when “Transaction Count” is selected, the merchant analysis system generates user interface 600 such that performance data is shown in the number of transactions. Merchant selector 645 can be used to command the merchant analysis system to show merchant locations for particular merchants. For example, as shown in FIG. 6A, Store A is selected in merchant selector 645 and the merchant analysis system generates user interface 600 to show data associated with Store A: merchant locations 620 are the locations of Store A's retail locations and the performance data shown in user interface 600 is for Store A. When Store B is selected, as shown in FIG. 6B, merchant analysis system generates user interface 600 to show data associated with Store B: merchant locations 621 are the locations of Store B's retail locations and the performance data shown in user interface 600 is for Store B. In some embodiments, when merchant selector 645 is selected, the displayed merchant locations include both the locations for the selected store and the selected store's competitors. For example, after Store A is selected, merchant locations 610 may include locations for Store A, and locations for Store C, a competitor of Store A.

In some embodiments, the merchant analysis system generates user interface 600 with color coded geohash regions (e.g. geohash region 615). The geohash regions can be color coded or highlighted in various ways to reflect the total spend amount or transaction count (depending on the performance data metric selected in performance data selector 640). User interface 600 can include key 650 that informs a user of the amount of sales for a particular color. As shown in FIG. 6A, when no specific retail location is selected, geohash regions 615 can be color coded or highlighted with the performance data for all locations of the merchant. For example, as shown in FIG. 6A, the darkest of geohash regions 615 contributed $1,500,000 in transactions for all merchant locations of Store A.

In some embodiments, the merchant analysis system can receive an indication that one of the merchant locations was selected by a user and it can update or regenerate the user interface to reflect the selection. FIGS. 7A-7D show several user interfaces that the merchant analysis system can generate when one merchant location has been selected by a user, consistent with the disclosed embodiments.

FIG. 7A illustrates user interface 700 including a map 710 where merchant location 720 has been selected. In response to receiving a message that merchant location 720 has been selected, the merchant analysis system generates user interface 700 to include performance data for merchant location 720. As shown in FIG. 7A, the geohash regions of map 710 are updated to reflect each geohash region's contribution to the performance of merchant location 720, i.e., the amount of spend or transactions of merchant location 720 that originated from that geohash region. In some embodiments, user interface 700 can also include performance element 760, which displays performance data for selected merchant location 720.

In some embodiments, the merchant analysis system generates user interface 700 and provides the ability for a user to select a group of geohash regions and display performance data for those geohash regions. FIG. 7B shows a selected group of geohash regions 725. When the merchant analysis system receives a command that one or more geohash regions were selected, it can regenerate user interface 700 to reflect performance data for the selected geohash regions. In some embodiments, user interface 700 can also include feature display 770, which shows feature characteristics for the selected geohash regions.

As noted above with respect to FIGS. 6A-6B, user interface 700 can include limit user interface element 735. As shown in FIG. 7C, limit user interface element 735 can include a gender filter 737 and user interface 700 can reflect data corresponding to selected genders. For example, as shown in FIG. 7B, user interface 700 is not displaying performance data for males as males have been deselected in gender filter 737. Limit user interface element 735 can also include transaction ticket size filter 738 (shown in FIG. 7D), which can be used to limit the size of transactions shown by user interface 700. When a transaction ticket size is selected, the merchant analysis system can regenerate or update user interface 700 to show performance using financial transaction data satisfying the selected transaction ticket size.

In some embodiments, the merchant analysis system can generate a user interface that includes predicted performance for merchant locations. FIGS. 8A-8B illustrate user interface 800 including predicted performance, consistent with embodiments of the present disclosure. User interface 800 includes map 810 which shows several merchant locations. According to some embodiments, user interface 800 includes indications of the predicted performance for each of the merchant locations. For example, as shown in FIG. 8A, the predicted performance in total spend amount is shown for each merchant location. When a merchant location is selected, the merchant analysis system can update user interface 800 to reflect performance data for the selected merchant location. In some embodiments, user interface 800 can include performance element 860, which displays the total spend and transaction count for the selected merchant, as well as an indication of performance (e.g., the text “UNDER-PERFORMING”).

According to some embodiments, in addition to displaying performance data, user interface 800 can include one or more of the features described above with respect FIGS. 6-7. For example, as shown in FIG. 8B, user interface 800 can include limit user interface element 835 and gender filter 837. When males are deselected from the gender filter, the user interface 800 can display performance data with respect to all consumers that are not male (i.e., female and unspecified consumers). Other filters can be used to limit the display of predicted performance data to certain features. For example, limit user interface element 835 can provide filters for merchant categories, age, income, transaction ticket size, or whether the transaction was associated with an e-commerce channel. In addition, predicted performance displayed can also be limited to category of shopper or other features consistent with disclosed embodiments.

In some embodiments, the merchant analysis system can predict revenue for a hypothetical entity location, with certain attractiveness attributes, at a particular placement. FIG. 9 shows user interface 900 including hypothetical entity location at placement 925. According to some embodiment, user interface 110 can provide the ability to select the placement of hypothetical entity location 925 by providing the ability to select a region on map 910 using an input device, such as a mouse or touchscreen. When a region on map 910 is selected, the merchant analysis system can receive a message containing the coordinates associated with the selection region, and it can then apply prediction models to the hypothetical entity location, and other entity locations within the same area as the hypothetical entity location, as described above with respect to FIG. 4 and equations (1) and (2). After the predicted spend amount for each entity location is determined (including for the hypothetical entity location), the merchant analysis system can generate or update user interface 900 to display the predicted spend. For example, as shown in FIG. 9, hypothetical entity location 925 has a predicted spend amount of $1,200,000.

According to some embodiments, the merchant analysis system can provide the ability to automatically place a store at an optimal placement based on the financial transaction data and the location of existing stores. FIG. 10 shows user interface 1000 with auto place button 1060. When selected, auto place button 1060 sends a message to the merchant analysis system to determine the optimal placement for a new retail location. In some embodiments, the merchant analysis system uses equations (1) and (2) described above with several hypothetical placements to the determine the optimal placement. Once determined, the merchant analysis system can generate user interface 1000 showing optimal placement 1020 on map 1010.

In the foregoing specification, embodiments have been described with reference to numerous specific details that can vary from implementation to implementation. Certain adaptations and modifications of the embodiments described herein can be made. Therefore, the above embodiments are considered to be illustrative and not restrictive. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A system for analyzing organizational entity performance, the system comprising: a memory device that stores a set of instructions; one or more processors configured to execute the set of instructions that cause the one or more processors to: receive data associated with a geographic region, the geographic region including a plurality of distinct merchant stores, wherein the received data is transformed into an object model using a schema map and an ontology, the object model comprising objects, properties and relationships; analyze the object model to associate the received data with an organizational entity and to associate the received data with a plurality of sub-geographic regions of the geographic region; apply a prediction model to the plurality of sub-geographic regions using the object model to determine a predicted performance associated with the organizational entity; and provide a user interface that includes information associated with the predicted performance.
 2. The system of claim 1 wherein the received data includes at least one of financial transaction data, consumer data associated with the geographic region, or entity data associated with the organizational entity.
 3. The system of claim 1 wherein the user interface includes: a representation of the geographic region; a representation of locations of the organizational entity overlayed on the geographic region; and a representation of the sub-geographic regions overlayed on the geographic region.
 4. The system of claim 1 wherein the predicted performance includes determining the predicted spend amount associated with the organizational entity based on the object model.
 5. The system of claim 4 wherein the user interface further includes: a representation of the predicted spend amount for the sub-geographic regions associated with the organizational entity.
 6. The system of claim 1 wherein the user interface further includes: a representation of the predicted performance associated with the organizational entity.
 7. The system of claim 1 wherein the one or more processors are further configured to receive a placement of a hypothetical entity location of the organizational entity wherein applying the prediction model further uses the placement of the hypothetical entity location to determine a predicted performance associated with the organizational entity.
 8. The system of claim 7 wherein the one or more processors are further configured to determine the predicted performance for the hypothetical entity location.
 9. The system of claim 1 wherein the one or more processors are further configured to determine a placement for a hypothetical entity location of the organizational entity based on the object model.
 10. A method for analyzing organizational entity performance, the method being performed by one or more processors of one or more computers and comprising: receiving data associated with a geographic region, the geographic region including a plurality of distinct merchant stores, wherein the received data is transformed into an object model using a schema map and an ontology, the object model comprising objects, properties and relationships; analyzing the object model to associate the received data with an organizational entity and to associate the received data with a plurality of sub-geographic regions of the geographic region; applying a prediction model to the plurality of sub-geographic regions using the object model to determine a predicted performance associated with the organizational entity; and providing a user interface that includes information associated with the predicted performance.
 11. The method of claim 10 wherein the received data includes at least one of financial transaction data, consumer data associated with the geographic region, or entity data associated with the at least one organizational entity.
 12. The method of claim 10 wherein the user interface includes: a representation of the geographic region; a representation of locations of the organizational entity overlayed on the geographic region; and a representation of the sub-geographic regions overlayed on the geographic region.
 13. The method of claim 10 wherein predicted performance includes determining the predicted spend amount associated with the organizational entity based on the object model.
 14. The method of claim 13 wherein the user interface further includes: a representation of the predicted spend amount for the sub-geographic regions associated with the organizational entity location.
 15. The method of claim 10 further including receiving a placement of a hypothetical entity location of the organizational entity and wherein applying the prediction model further uses the placement of the hypothetical entity location to determine a predicted performance associated with the organization entity.
 16. The method of claim 15 further including determining the predicted performance for the hypothetical entity location.
 17. The method of claim 10 further including determining a placement for a hypothetical entity location of an organizational entity based on the object model.
 18. A non-transitory computer readable medium that stores a set of instructions that are executable by at least one processor of one or more computers to cause the one or more computers to analyze organizational entity performance, the set of instructions causing the one or more computers to: receive data associated with a geographic region, the geographic region including a plurality of distinct merchant stores, wherein the received data is transformed into an object model using a schema map and an ontology, the object model comprising objects, properties and relationships; analyze the object model to associate the received data with at least one organizational entity and to associate the received data with a plurality of sub-geographic regions of the geographic region; apply a prediction model to the plurality of sub-geographic regions using the object model to determine a predicted performance associated with the organizational entity; and provide a user interface that includes information associated with the predicted performance.
 19. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 18 further comprising instructions executable for the at least one processor of the one or more computers to cause the one or more computers to perform: receiving a placement of a hypothetical entity location of the organizational entity and wherein applying the prediction model further uses the placement of the hypothetical entity location to determine a predicted performance associated with the organization entity.
 20. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 18 further comprising instructions executable for the at least one processor of the one or more computers to cause the one or more computers to perform: determining the predicted performance for the hypothetical entity location. 